THE process for granting senior counsel (silk) status in Trinidad and Tobago appears nepotistic, with many recipients seemingly unworthy of the honour, primarily due to their political connections.

This prestigious title, ideally awarded to those with exceptional legal acumen and contributions to the Judiciary, has become mired in controversy. The perception is that selections are influenced by party affiliations rather than merit, eroding public trust in the legal system.

The criteria for awarding silk should be transparent and based on demonstrated excellence in legal practice, contributions to the legal profession, and service to the community. However, the current process lacks transparency, fostering a culture of favouritism.

Many believe that those with connections to the ruling party or influential figures receive preferential treatment, undermining the award’s integrity and devaluing the accomplishments of genuinely deserving candidates.

To restore credibility, the selection process must be overhauled. Establishing an independent panel with clear, objective criteria for evaluation is crucial. This panel should include respected members of the legal community, free from political influence.

Additionally, making the nomination and selection processes public would enhance transparency and accountability.

By addressing these issues, the process can be refocused on recognising true merit, ensuring senior counsel titles are awarded based on skill, dedication and contribution to the legal field, rather than political connections.

This reform is essential to uphold the honour and respect traditionally associated with the title of senior counsel.

Gordon Laughlin Westmoorings